Saturday, October 13, 2007

Expert's say:

Experts have conducted extensive research to investigate the variations between mean and woman and how they conduct their work. Alice Eagley, a lead author of the study and professor of psychology at Northwestern University co-investigator of the study include Mary C. Johannesen Schmidt and Melrose L. Van Eugene Tilburg University, the Netherlands concluded to this statement. “Specifically, women were more likely to be transformation leaders, defined as those who serve as role models, mentors, and empower workers performance and effectiveness in today’s world.” This just goes to show you that this study not only conducted by a women but men as well can wrap up that women have an aggressive trait to generate cogency in any position they employ in.

Linda Feldman, a reporter for Dateline reported:

“ Still 82% percent acceptance means tat not long ago, 18 percent of the public wasn’t willing to vote for a women, which points up an immense barrier that women still face- probably owing in large part to plan old sexism. That persistent reluctance will make it that much harder for the women to raise the money and gain the party backing they would need to make a credible run for the Oval office.” Although this report was established before Bush’s presidency it perceives the point that the American public had and how we are in a deadlock. Women are having this hard time as described by Linda Feldman.

Once again Linda Feldman reported another subjective article called “Time for Madame President?” can issued which concentrated on the same position.

“What’s America’s future woman presidents need first, though, is to build their resumes. That means winning important stepping stone-offices. In Congress, both houses have record number of women – nine out of 100 senators and 55 out of 435 House members – but those numbers remain low. Governorship lately has been even better training ground for presidents, but only three out of 50 governors are women.” Once again Feldman shows her position, that there is an insufficient amount woman in government which also supports my position in this controversial conflict.

Other countries sucess

Internationally we may be the only country to have equality within our people but, other countries have accepted this idea too. It has not been that long and yet other countries have already had successful women leaders running their country. Why should we be lagging behind? “And women have had the top job in other major democracies: British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and Israeli Prime Golda Meir among them. On Monday, a month-long political deadlock was broken in Germany with a deal that will make consecutive leader Angela Merkel the first female chancellor there.” (Excerpt from Women in power in the other countries). This lucidly shows that women in other countries have already taken the step to show womanhood in their government. Government and the people globally are able to accept woman in the position to oversee their country. It comes to me very phenomenal that the Untied States still hasn’t been able to except this fact. It is not only the people but, woman in this country still carry this belief that they may not be able to withhold a position in the government because women themselves can not see them fulfill this position. It’s not only other countries success that makes us respond extensively but, the response from citizens of the country that contributes to the fact about women. A woman’s aggressiveness is not able to match with anything and the country needs this right now as because it is slowly degrading into the hands of war.